-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8.xml
352 lines (352 loc) · 23.5 KB
/
ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 4, T. 1, Q. 8</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 4, T. 1, Q. 8</title>
<date when="2017-10-16">October 16, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qd" n="quaracchi1948d">Quaracchi 1948, Volume 4</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-10-16" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Hd1e102">III, P. 2, Inq. 4, T. 1, Q. 8</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Hd1e105" type="question-title">DE ADDITIONE EVANGELII AD LEGEM<!--1-->.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e108">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Quaeritur postea de additione Evangelii ad Legem<!--a-->. Et haec quaestio tere ea<lb ed="#Qd"/>dem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est cum quaestione de impletione Legis per Evangelium et<!--b--> pertinet ad
<lb ed="#Qd"/>convenientiam Legis et Evangelii.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e119">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad quod sic: a. <title>Matth.</title> 5, 17: <quote>Non veni Legem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>solvere aut Prophetas, sed adimplere</quote>. <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Qd"/>nus</name><!--c-->,
in <title>Quaestionibus Novi et Veteris Testa<lb ed="#Qd"/>menti</title><!--2-->:
<quote>Non dicit implere se Legem aut Pro<lb ed="#Qd"/>phetas,
sed <quote>adimplere</quote>; adimplere autem non aliud
<lb ed="#Qd"/>significat quam plene addere. Quid est autem<!--d-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>addere ad Prophetas, nisi culturam Dei sub Tri<lb ed="#Qd"/>nitatis
nomine ordinare?</quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>b. Item<!--3-->, Legem adimplesse est manentibus<!--e-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>praeteritis nova addere, ut puta<!--4-->: <quote>Dictum est an<lb ed="#Qd"/>tiquis:
Oculum pro oculo</quote> etc. <quote>Ego autem dico vo<lb ed="#Qd"/>bis,
non resistere malo</quote>. Ergo Evangelium addit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad Legem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e155">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>c. Item, super illud <title>Matth.</title> 5, 17: <quote>Non veni sol<lb ed="#Qd"/>vere
Legem</quote> etc., <title>Glossa</title><!--5-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e161">Aut addendo quod
<lb ed="#Qd"/>minus habet aut implendo quod iubet</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e167">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>c. Item, ibidem, alia<!--f--> <title>Glossa</title><!--b--> super illud<!--7-->:
<lb ed="#Qd"/><quote>Nisi abundaverit iustitia vestra</quote> etc.: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e173">Id est nisi
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non<!--g--> solum illa minima Legis praecepta feceritis,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sed etiam ea quae addo</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e181">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Contra: 1. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, <title>Contra Fausto</title><!--8-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e188">Christus <quote>non</quote> venit <quote>Legem solvere, sed adim<lb ed="#Qd"/>plere</quote><!--9-->,
non ut chi adderentur quae deerant, sed
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ut Fierent quae scripta<!--h--> erant; quod eius verba
<lb ed="#Qd"/>testantur. Non enim ait<!--10-->: <quote>Iota unum aut unus apex
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non transibit a Lege, donec</quote> addantur<!--i--> quae de<lb ed="#Qd"/>sunt,
sed ait: <quote>Donec omnia fiant</quote></quote>. Ergo<!--k--> non
<lb ed="#Qd"/>addit Evangelium Legi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e204">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>2. Item, <title>Matth.</title> 5, 11, super illud: <quote>Non veni sol<lb ed="#Qd"/>vere
Legem</quote> etc.: Evangelium est recapitulatio<!--11-->;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sed ubi est recapitulatio<!--l-->, non est additio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e213">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>3. Item, ad salutem non sunt necessaria nisi cre<lb ed="#Qd"/>denda
et<!--m--> operanda. Sed credendis nihil additum
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est, quia, sicut dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--12-->, tempora
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sunt mutata, non fides; nec operandis, quia
<lb ed="#Qd"/>omnia operando reducuntur ad dilectionem Dei
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et proximi, <title>Matth.</title> 22, 40: <quote>In iis duobus mundatis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>universa Lex pendet et Prophetae</quote>. Sed iis man<lb ed="#Qd"/>datis
nihil additum est, quia ibi praecipitur di<lb ed="#Qd"/>ligere
<quote>Deum ex tam anima et ex fata mente</quote><!--13-->,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quo praecepto nihil perfectius in Evangelio man<lb ed="#Qd"/>datur;
ergo moralibus Legis nihil est additum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e245">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>4. Item, dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name> et probat, in li<lb ed="#Qd"/>bro
<title>Contra adversarium Legis et Prophetarum</title><!--14-->,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e256">mitius<!--n--> est <quote>oculum pro oculo, dentem pro
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dente</quote><!--15--> homini auferre, ubi<!--o--> mensura vindictae,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>modum non transit iniuriae, quam pro non ex<lb ed="#Qd"/>hibita
humanitate</quote> poenam aeternam inferre. Si
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ergo iudicium Legis facit primum, <title>Exod.</title> 21, 24,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iudicium Evangelii facit secundum, <title>Matth.</title> 21<!--16-->:
<lb ed="#Qd"/><quote>Esurivi, et non dedistis<!--p--> mihi manducare</quote>, ergo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non est additio misericordiae per Evangelium
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad severitatem Legis, quam additionem ponunt
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad Legis iudicialia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e280">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>5. Item, ei quod evacuatur nihil omnino addi<lb ed="#Qd"/>tur.
Si ergo praecepta caerimonialia Legis per
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Evangelium evacuantur, ergo praeceptis caerimo<lb ed="#Qd"/>nialibus
per Evangelium nihil additur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e291">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ex iis<!--q--> ergo relinquitur quod nec moralibus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>nec iudicialibus<!--r--> nec caerimonialibus praeceptis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Legis aliquid per Evangelium additur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e300">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Respondeo: Secundum B. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinum</name><!--17--> est
<lb ed="#Qd"/>considerare Legem quantum ad sensum et est con<lb ed="#Qd"/>siderare
Legem quantum ad litteram.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e312">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Si consideremus Legem quantum ad sensum,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>distinguemus additionem duplicem: quantum ad
<pb ed="#Qd" n="866"/>
<cb ed="#Qd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>innovationem<!--a--> praeceptorum et quantum ad elu<lb ed="#Qd"/>cidationem
praeceptorum. Quantum ad innova<lb ed="#Qd"/>tionem
praeceptorum non addit Evangelium Legi
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quantum ad sensum. Unde dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>in <title>Quaestionibus Novi et Veteris Testamenti</title><!--1-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e336">Cum dictum est in Evangelio<!--2--> <quote>audistis quia
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dictum est antiquis: Oculum pro oculo. Ego au<lb ed="#Qd"/>tem
dico vobis, non resistere malo</quote>, non aliud
<lb ed="#Qd"/>voluit quam Lex in sensu habuit</quote>. - Quantum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad elucidationem dicendum quod est additio
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Evangelii ad Legem, et hoc respectu figuralium
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et respectu moralium. Respectu figuralium, quia
<lb ed="#Qd"/>intelligentia occulta figurarum manifestatur per
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Evangelium. Unde <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in libro <title>De
<lb ed="#Qd"/>catechizandis rudibus</title><!--3-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e362">In Veteri Testamento
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est occultatio Novi<!--b-->, in Novo Testamento est
<lb ed="#Qd"/>manifestatio<!--c--> Veteris</quote>. Respectu vero moralium
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est additio sicut expliciti ad implicitum, quem<lb ed="#Qd"/>admodum
ostendit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, <title>Contra Fau<lb ed="#Qd"/>stum</title><!--4-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e379">Quia non<!--d--> intelligebant Iudaei homi<lb ed="#Qd"/>cidium
nisi peremptionem corporis humani, per
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quam vita privaretur, aperuit Dominus omnem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iniquum motum ad nocendum fratri in homicidii
<lb ed="#Qd"/>genere deputari; unde et Ioannes dicit: <quote>Qui adit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>fratrem suum homicida est</quote>, <title>I Ioan.</title> 3, 15. Et quo<lb ed="#Qd"/>niam
putabant tantummodo corporalem cum fe<lb ed="#Qd"/>mina
commixtionem illicitam vocari moechiam,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>demonstravit<name ref="#Lombard">Magister</name>etiam talem concupiscen<lb ed="#Qd"/>tiam
nihil esse aliud</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e405">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Item, considerando Legem quantum ad litteram,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>addit Evangelium Legi, sed differenter quantum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad caerimonialia, quantum ad moralia, quantum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad iudicialia. Caerimonialibus, in quibus promit<lb ed="#Qd"/>tebatur
Christus, sicut dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--5--> et
<lb ed="#Qd"/><name>Apostolus</name><!--6-->, fit additio, sicut exhibitio addit pro<lb ed="#Qd"/>missioni.
Et secundum hoc dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--e-->,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>in I libro <title>Contra adversarium Legis et Prophe<lb ed="#Qd"/>tarum</title><!--7-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e433">Qui recte colit Deum, utriusque Testa<lb ed="#Qd"/>menti
invenit unum Deum, in illo intelligens pro<lb ed="#Qd"/>missum,
in isto accipiens redditum Christum</quote>.
<lb ed="#Qb"/>— Moralibus<!--f--> vero fit additio quemadmodum ad<lb ed="#Qd"/>dit
prohibitio causae vel occasionis ad actum, sive
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sicut addit prohibitio sive iussio affectus ad pro<lb ed="#Qd"/>hibitionem
effectus. Unde <name>Chrysostomus</name> a, su<lb ed="#Qd"/>per
illud <title>Matth.</title> 5, 22: <quote>Omnis qui irascitur fratri
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>suo</quote> etc. <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e453">Qui non irascitur, non accidit; licen<lb ed="#Qd"/>tia<!--g-->
enim irascendi causa est homicidii. Tolle
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iram, et homicidium non erit</quote>. In hoc ergo quod<!--h-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Evangelium prohibet iram quantum ad litteram<!--i-->,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quae est causa vel occasio homicidii, Lex vero
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quantum ad litteram non prohibet nisi actum,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dicens <quote>non occides</quote>, <title>Exod.</title> 20, 13, additio est
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sicut causae<!--k--> vel occasionis ad actum. Similiter
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dicit <name>Hieronymus</name><!--9--> super illud<!--10-->: <quote>Diligite ini<lb ed="#Qd"/>micos</quote><!--l-->
etc.: <quote>Omnis occasio irae tollitur</quote>, dum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>inimicos diligere iubemur. — Item, moralibus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>fit additio, sicut iustitia beneficentiae addit iusti<lb ed="#Qd"/>tiae
innocentiae, sive sicut iustitia<!--m--> fidei spiri<lb ed="#Qd"/>tualis
addit iustitiae temporali. Unde <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Qd"/>nus</name>,
in <title>Quaestionibus Novi et Veteris Testa<lb ed="#Qd"/>menti</title><!--11-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e488">Lex per Moysen data<!--n--> iustitiam habe<lb ed="#Qd"/>bat
quidem, sed terrenam<!--o-->, ut servantes Legem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iusti essent ad praesens, ut non rei<!--p--> fierent;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iustus est enim ex Lege qui<!--q--> nulli nocet. Unde
<lb ed="#Qd"/><name>Apostolus</name>: <quote>Lex</quote>, inquit, <quote>non est ex fide, sed qui
<lb ed="#Qd"/>fecerit ea, vivet in eis</quote>, ad <title>Rom.</title> 10<!--12-->, hoc est, fa<lb ed="#Qd"/>ciens
Legem non morietur, sed vivit ad prae<lb ed="#Qd"/>sens<!--13-->.
Iustitia autem quae ex fide est iustificat
<lb ed="#Qd"/>homines apud Deum, ut remunerentur in futuro
<lb ed="#Qd"/>saeculo: addiderunt enim temporali iustitiae iu<lb ed="#Qd"/>stitiam
fidei</quote>. — Iudicialibus vero fit additio sicut
<lb ed="#Qd"/>addit potius et perfectius ad imperfectum, et hoc
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est quod dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in <title>Quaestionibus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Novi et Veteris Testamenti</title><!--r14-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e522">Cum dictum sit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>antiquis <quote>oculum pro oculo, dico non resistere
<lb ed="#Qd"/>malo</quote>, hoc dicendo non Legem dextruxit, sed
<lb ed="#Qd"/>potiora addidit<!--s-->, non ut peccare videretur qui
<lb ed="#Qd"/>se vindicat, sed ut melior sit qui non retribuit</quote>,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et intellige, qui se vindicat<!--t--> iuste.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e536">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Praeterea, sunt modi alii additionis Evangelii
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad Legem qui pertinent ad Legis impletionem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>per Evangelium, de quibus immediate dicetur,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>cum quaeretur de impletione Legis per Christum<!--15-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e548">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad primum ergo quod obi<lb ed="#Qd"/>cit
quod Evangelium non addit Legi quae de<lb ed="#Qd"/>erant,
sicut dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, patet responsio:
<lb ed="#Qd"/>nam hoc non intelligitur de additione respectu
<lb ed="#Qd"/>litterae Legis, sed respectu sensus Legis. Addi<lb ed="#Qd"/>tio
ergo fit Legi quantum ad litteram per inno<lb ed="#Qd"/>vationem
praecepti, sed non quantum ad sensum,
<pb ed="#Qd" n="867"/>
<cb ed="#Qd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>nisi solum per elucidationem. Et hoc est quod
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in <title>Quaestionibus Novi et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Veteris Testamenti</title><!--a1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e582">Dicit Dominus, <title>Matth.</title>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>5, 21, 43: <quote>Dictum est antiquis: Diliges proximum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et odio habebis inimicum</quote>; haec iustitia est</quote>, et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>intellige de odio, quo persequimur vitium, non
<lb ed="#Qd"/>naturam; <quote>Dominus autem<!--2-->: <quote>Ego</quote>, inquit, <quote>dico
<lb ed="#Qd"/>vobis: Diligite inimicos</quote>. Addit utique, quia non
<lb ed="#Qd"/>destruxit vera, sed ut perfectis potiora mandavit.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Inimicus enim, hoc est malus, quia retributione,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quae fit iustitia dictante, nec emendari<!--b--> nec cor<lb ed="#Qd"/>rigi
potuit, per amorem et obsequium illum sal<lb ed="#Qd"/>vum
fieri voluit, quod et Lex in sensibus ha<lb ed="#Qd"/>bebat</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e612">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>2. Ad secundum similiter patet responsio,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quia Evangelium dicitur recapitulatio Legis quoad
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sensum, non quoad litteram, per modum qui
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dictus est<!--3-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e623">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>3. Ad tertium dicendum quod, quantum ad
<lb ed="#Qd"/>substantiam fidei, credendis nihil additum est,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>tamen articulis fidei aliquid additum est, et addi<lb ed="#Qd"/>tio<!--c-->
ista est sicut expliciti ad implicitum et<!--d-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>determinati ad indeterminatum, ut patet exemplo<!--4-->.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ante tempus Abrahae fuit fides reparationis no<lb ed="#Qd"/>strae,
tamen implicita. Postea, aliquantulum fuit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>explicita Abrahae quod fieret in carne, cum dic<lb ed="#Qd"/>tum
est ei: <quote>In semine tuo benedicentur omnes
<lb ed="#Qd"/>gentes</quote>, <title>Gen.</title> 22, 18, et ita articulus de incarna<lb ed="#Qd"/>tione,
qui prius erat implicitus, factus est ali<lb ed="#Qd"/>quantulum
explicitus. Tamen adhuc non erat de<lb ed="#Qd"/>terminatum
utrum incarnatio fieret de viro et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>muliere, quousque dixit Isaias: <quote>Ecce virgo conci<lb ed="#Qd"/>piet</quote>,
<title>Isai.</title> 7, 14. Item, adhuc non erat determina<lb ed="#Qd"/>tus
modus per quem Virgo conciperet<!--e-->, quousque
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dixit angelus<!--5-->: <quote>Spiritus Sanctus superveniet in te</quote>.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Fides ergo non mutata est, sed tamen additio
<lb ed="#Qd"/>facta est in fide reparationis articuli ad articu<lb ed="#Qd"/>lum<!--f-->,
sicut expliciti ad implicitum vel magis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>expliciti ad! minus explicitum. - Similiter di<lb ed="#Qd"/>cendum
quod moralibus, quantum ad potesta<lb ed="#Qd"/>tem
sensus, nihil additum est, sed, quantum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad rationem litterae, additio facta est per illos
<lb ed="#Qd"/>modos qui dicti sunt<!--6-->. Unde ad illud quod
<lb ed="#Qd"/>obicit de praecepto dilectionis Dei <quote>ex toto corde,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ex tota<!--h--> anima, ex tota mente</quote>, dicendum quod
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>secundum acceptionem<!--i--> litterae, ut a Iudaeis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>intelligebatur, [intelligebatur] dilectio <quote>ex corde,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ex anima, ex mente</quote>, ut ex amore declinaretur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>malum et nihil facerent<!--k--> Deo contrarium Evan<lb ed="#Qd"/>gelium
vero ista<!--l--> accipit, non solum ut ex
<lb ed="#Qd"/>amore declinetur malum, sed fiat bonum, et totis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>viribus intentionis affectus humanus feratur in
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Deum. Unde signanter in <title>Marc.</title> 12, 30 additum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est diligere <quote>ex virtute</quote>, cum dictum est: <quote>Diliges
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde<!--m-->, ex tota
<lb ed="#Qd"/>anima<!--n-->, ex tota mente<!--o--> et ex tota virtute tua</quote>, ut
<lb ed="#Qd"/>monstretur quod non sufficit diligere <quote>ex toto
<lb ed="#Qd"/>corde</quote>, id est intellectu, declinando errorem; <quote>ex
<lb ed="#Qd"/>tota anima</quote>, id est voluntate, declinando contra<lb ed="#Qd"/>dictionem;
<quote>ex tota mente</quote>, id est memoria, vitando
<lb ed="#Qd"/>oblivionem, sed <quote>ex tota virtute</quote>, addendo bonam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>operationem et rectam in Deum intentionem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e723">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>4. Ad aliud dicendum, secundum <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Qd"/>num</name>,
in I<!--p--> libro <quote>Contra adversarium Legis et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Prophetarum</quote><!--7-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e731">In utroque Dei unius Testamento
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dicimus et amandam bonitatem et timendam se<lb ed="#Qd"/>veritatem.
Quamvis in Veteri Testamento propter
<lb ed="#Qd"/>temporalium promissionem malorumque commi<lb ed="#Qd"/>nationem
servos pariat temporalis Ierusalem, in
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Novo autem, ubi fides impetrat caritatem qua
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Lex possit impleri, non magis timore poenae
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quam dilectione iustitiae liberos pariat aeterna
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ierusalem<!--8--></quote>. Quamvis ergo severius iudicium ali<lb ed="#Qd"/>quando
exprimatur in littera Evangelii quam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Legis, tamen amoris ratio superabundat<!--q--> in Evan<lb ed="#Qd"/>gelio,
quemadmodum et in Lege ratio timoris,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sicut supra declaratum est Quaestione de diffe<lb ed="#Qd"/>rentia
Legis et Evangelii quantum ad timorem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et amorem<!--9-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-d1e765">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>5. Ad ultimum quod obicitur de caerimo<lb ed="#Qd"/>nialibus,
patet responsio. Nam caerimonialibus<!--r-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non fit additio sicut permanenti additur perfectio,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sed sicut promissioni additur exhibitio. Unde
<lb ed="#Qd"/>super illud <title>Psalmi</title><!--10-->: <quote>Sacrificium et ablationem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>noluisti</quote>, dicit <title>Glossa</title><!--11-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in4t1q8-Qd1e780">Ut venit res, noluit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Deus illa legalia, quae erant quasi verba promit<lb ed="#Qd"/>tentia.
Tamdiu est promissor, donec det; ut de<lb ed="#Qd"/>dit,
mutat verbum, non dicit <mentioned>dabo</mentioned>, sed <mentioned>dedi</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ipso ergo veniente, noluit ea<!--s--> quae erant eius
<lb ed="#Qd"/>figura</quote>.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>