-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
cod-LyXLXy_wo8uy7-d1e2040.xml
105 lines (105 loc) · 5.8 KB
/
cod-LyXLXy_wo8uy7-d1e2040.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 12(14)</title>
<author ref="#Ockham">Ockham</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 12(14)</title>
<date when="2020-09-10">September 10, 2020</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-LyXLXy">Lyon 1495</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2020-09-10" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="wo8uy7-d1e2040"><!-- l2q12(14) -->
<head xml:id="wo8uy7-d1e2040-Hd1e108">Quaestio 12(14)</head>
<p xml:id="wo8uy7-d1e2040-d1e111">
Questio. xiiii.
<lb ed="#L" n="40"/>UTrum angelus
intel<lb ed="#L" n="41" break="no"/>ligat alia a se per essentiam suam vel per
<lb ed="#L" n="42"/>loperationes. Quod per essentiam probatur: quia si
<lb ed="#L" n="43"/>non hoc non potest esse nisi quadrupliciter: aut quia vna
<lb ed="#L" n="44"/>res non potest esse ratio cognoscendi aliam: aut quia ratio co
<lb ed="#L" n="45"/>gnoscendi debet esse perfectior cognito: aut quia vna
<lb ed="#L" n="46"/>cognitio non potest esse nisi vnius rei: aut quia vna
<lb ed="#L" n="47"/>ratio non potest esse infinitorum. Non propter primum
<lb ed="#L" n="48"/>tum quia subiectum est ratio cognoscendi passionem. tum
<lb ed="#L" n="49"/>qui species rei est ratio cognoscendi rem absolutam: nec
pro<lb ed="#L" n="50" break="no"/>pter secundum quia in absentia obiecti perfectorum
intel<lb ed="#L" n="51" break="no"/>lectus potest illud inte lligere quod est imperfectius
<lb ed="#L" n="52"/>puta per speciem. nec propter tertium: quia sicut non repu
<lb ed="#L" n="53"/>gnat vni cause effectiue plura producem: ita (vt
<lb ed="#L" n="54"/>videtur) non repugnat vni rationi plura represen¬
<!--615.xml-->
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
<!-- 306-v -->
<lb ed="#L" n="55"/>tare et esse ratio cognoscendi plura. Nec propi
<lb ed="#L" n="56"/>quartum: quia non magis potest concludi infinitas in ratio
<lb ed="#L" n="57"/>cognoscendi ex hoc quod est ratio cognoscendi infinita
<lb ed="#L" n="58"/>quam potest concludi infinitas in causa ex infinitate effectuum
<lb ed="#L" n="59"/>producibilium ab ea: quia ratio congnoscendi non est
ma<lb ed="#L" n="60" break="no"/>ior perfectio vel magis perfecta quam ratio producendi. sed
<lb ed="#L" n="61"/>ex infinitate effectuum non arguitur infinitas in causa
<lb ed="#L" n="62"/>qui inte lectus potest causare infinitas intellecti
<lb ed="#L" n="63"/>ones et voluntas infinitas volitiones. nam secundum Au
<lb ed="#L" n="64"/>gustinum tertio de trinitate caplo. xiii. in actibus
<lb ed="#L" n="65"/>reflexis est processus in infinitum. ergo etc. Si dicas
<lb ed="#L" n="66"/>quod intellectus est causa partialis respectu actus su
<lb ed="#L" n="67"/>et voluntas similiter. et ideo non sequitur infinitas. Contra
<lb ed="#L" n="68"/>coformiter dico de ratione cognoscendi quod est caus
<lb ed="#L" n="69"/>et ratio partialis repraesentandi infinita. ergo etc.
Confir<lb ed="#L" n="70" break="no"/>matur. non magis repugnat deo concurrere cum
<lb ed="#L" n="71"/>illa ratione ad repraesentandum infinita quam cum causa secunda
<lb ed="#L" n="72"/>ad producendum infinita: sed primum potest. ergo et secundum
<lb ed="#L" n="73"/>Ad oppositum posita potentia sufficiente et ratione re
<lb ed="#L" n="74"/>praesentandi potest potentia exire in actum nisi volun
<lb ed="#L" n="75"/>tas impediat. ergo posito intellectu angelico cum
<lb ed="#L" n="76"/>sua essentia solum sine omni alio si non impediat impe
<lb ed="#L" n="77"/>rium voluntatis potest omnia intelligere quod fal
<lb ed="#L" n="78"/>sum est. ergo etc.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>