You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I found the 'id' field misleading, interpreting it as an id to retrieve the project from the GH API.
Can it be removed if it's only a GHSearch internal identifier?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe this is the id returned by GH's API. In that case it would be useful to have it. Possibly related to #17.
I tried to use it to retrieve repos in a more reliable way (guessing that an id would remain the same in case of ownership/name changes) but I found inconsistencies (completely different repos returned).
As of now, it's an internal ID that needs to be removed, or better, will be replaced with a time-invariant unique ID of repositories as you brought up in #17. So I close this issue and leave #17 opens to address it.
Hi,
I found the 'id' field misleading, interpreting it as an id to retrieve the project from the GH API.
Can it be removed if it's only a GHSearch internal identifier?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: