Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

optimize: use iterator to remove timeout future. #1920

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 20, 2019

Conversation

objcoding
Copy link
Contributor

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

1.use iterator to remove timeout future.
2.print log when load extConfiguration.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 19, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1920 into develop will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #1920      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      55.33%   55.35%   +0.01%     
- Complexity      2405     2406       +1     
=============================================
  Files            428      428              
  Lines          14365    14361       -4     
  Branches        1695     1694       -1     
=============================================
  Hits            7949     7949              
+ Misses          5698     5695       -3     
+ Partials         718      717       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...a/io/seata/core/rpc/netty/AbstractRpcRemoting.java 9.64% <0%> (-0.31%) 3 <0> (ø)
...server/store/file/FileTransactionStoreManager.java 57.27% <0%> (+0.31%) 30% <0%> (+1%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@l81893521 l81893521 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@slievrly slievrly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, because it is ConcurrentMap, why not just use for, but use iterator to loop?

@objcoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM, because it is ConcurrentMap, why not just use for, but use iterator to loop?

ok,it has been modified.

@xingfudeshi xingfudeshi added the first-time contributor first-time contributor label Nov 20, 2019
Copy link
Member

@jsbxyyx jsbxyyx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@xingfudeshi xingfudeshi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@xingfudeshi xingfudeshi merged commit 5926fba into apache:develop Nov 20, 2019
@slievrly slievrly added this to the 1.0 milestone Dec 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
first-time contributor first-time contributor
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants