optimize: standardized the properties of codecov.yml

[l81893521]

• I have registered the PR changes.

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

standardized the properties of codecov.yml

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5918 (7bab56f) into develop (357f8e8) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
Report is 81 commits behind head on develop.
The diff coverage is 69.90%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #5918      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      48.79%   48.81%   +0.01%     
+ Complexity      4176     4167       -9     
=============================================
  Files            743      793      +50     
  Lines          26617    28003    +1386     
  Branches        3327     3417      +90     
=============================================
+ Hits           12989    13669     +680     
- Misses         12225    12911     +686     
- Partials        1403     1423      +20     

Files	Coverage Δ
...c/main/java/io/seata/common/ConfigurationKeys.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ommon/src/main/java/io/seata/common/Constants.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../src/main/java/io/seata/common/util/BlobUtils.java	60.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...n/src/main/java/io/seata/common/util/PageUtil.java	50.00% <ø> (ø)
...ava/io/seata/compressor/deflater/DeflaterUtil.java	80.64% <100.00%> (ø)
.../main/java/io/seata/config/ConfigurationCache.java	73.33% <100.00%> (-0.75%)	⬇️
...c/main/java/io/seata/core/context/RootContext.java	46.77% <ø> (ø)
...seata/core/exception/TransactionExceptionCode.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...o/seata/core/protocol/AbstractIdentifyRequest.java	78.57% <100.00%> (+8.57%)	⬆️
.../seata/core/protocol/AbstractIdentifyResponse.java	75.00% <100.00%> (-6.49%)	⬇️
... and 116 more

... and 72 files with indirect coverage changes

[slievrly]

more upper folder?

Does this include the following cases?

server/test/xxx

[l81893521]

yes, this rule will ignore any folders and files that call test. The example: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/ignoring-paths#ignoring-specific-file-names

[slievrly]

LGTM