Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

[BUG-230619] Separate Appearance shapers option for head only and body only. #8252

Closed
4 tasks
sl-service-account opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Comments

@sl-service-account
Copy link

sl-service-account commented Apr 25, 2021

How would you like the feature to work?

 

Separating head and body shaping settings in appearance as an option to choose to apply head shape only or apply body shape only or apply both.

 

Apply Head Shape Option Only = Head+Eyes+Ears+Nose+Mouth+Chin 

 Apply Body Shape Option Only = Body+Torso+Legs

 

This would make customizing avatars easier, simpler, more specific and time saving.

Why is this feature important to you? How would it benefit the community?

The appearance head and body shapers are connected. So if, for example, you find a head shape you like, you can't just apply it to your head - it will also reconfigure the avatar body as well so you have to go back into appearance and manually reset your preferred body settings which is a huge time sucking PITA.

As mesh heads and bodies now dominate SL, having the ability to purchase separate head and body shapes specific to different head and body brands/types and not have to reset body or head shapes manually would be game changing. It would allow more specific customization and would simplify and save SL residents a lot of time in creating avatars.

It would be great for SL merchants as well. They can create more specific shapes for heads only or bodies only.

This would allow SL consumers to purchase a head shape specific to their mesh head brand/type from one shop/creator and a body shape specific to their mesh body brand/type from another shop/creator.

This should also work on any full head/body shape that already exists as the apply head shape only or apply body shape only would only apply the shape sliders for head config only or body config only or to both.

This would also work for classic/system avatars.

It's a win/win for everyone.

Links

Related

Original Jira Fields
Field Value
Issue BUG-230619
Summary Separate Appearance shapers option for head only and body only.
Type New Feature Request
Priority Unset
Status Closed
Resolution Duplicate
Reporter Pixels Sideways (pixels.sideways)
Created at 2021-04-25T18:27:03Z
Updated at 2021-07-26T18:22:22Z
{
  'Build Id': 'unset',
  'Business Unit': ['Platform'],
  'Date of First Response': '2021-04-27T10:08:48.110-0500',
  'How would you like the feature to work?': "The appearance head and body shapers are connected.   So if, for example, you find a head shape you like, you can't just apply it to your head - it will also reconfigure the avatar body as well so you have to go back into appearance and manually reset your preferred body settings which is a huge time sucking PITA.\r\n\r\nSeparating head and body shaping settings in appearance as an option to choose to apply head shape only or body shape only or both.  \r\n\r\nThis would make customizing avatars easier, simpler and time saving. \r\n",
  'ReOpened Count': 0.0,
  'Severity': 'Unset',
  'Target Viewer Version': 'viewer-development',
  'Why is this feature important to you? How would it benefit the community?': "As mesh heads and bodies now dominate SL, having the ability to purchase separate head and body shapes specific to different head and body brands/types and not have to reset body or head shapes manually would be game changing.   It would allow more specific customization and would simplify and save SL residents a lot of time in creating avatars.  \r\n\r\nIt would be great for SL merchants as well.  They can create more specific shapes for heads only or bodies only.  \r\n\r\nThis would allow SL consumers to purchase a head shape specific to their mesh head brand/type from one shop/creator and a body shape specific to their mesh body brand/type from another shop/creator.\r\n\r\nThis would also work for classic/system avatars.\r\n\r\nIt's a win/win for everyone.",
}
@sl-service-account
Copy link
Author

Whirly Fizzle commented at 2021-04-27T15:08:48Z

For Lindens: I think this feature is already filed internally under SL-567.

@sl-service-account
Copy link
Author

Vir Linden commented at 2021-05-05T16:53:57Z

Thanks! We have this proposal already in our queue for possible future work. Would be useful but not super simple to implement, so I can't say anything about how soon we might be able to work on it.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant