We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To avoid misunderstandings when writing code, and aid readability when reading code, the following expressions:
(exprA || exprB && exprC); (exprA && exprB || exprC);
Must be written as:
(exprA || (exprB && exprC)); ((exprA && exprB) || exprC);
Obviously it is also valid to write them as:
((exprA || exprB) && exprC); (exprA && (exprB || exprC));
The idea here is to avoid any possible confusion around precedens in the operators.
Other cases that needs taken care of are most welcome additions to this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
To avoid misunderstandings when writing code, and aid readability when reading code, the following expressions:
Must be written as:
Obviously it is also valid to write them as:
The idea here is to avoid any possible confusion around precedens in the operators.
Other cases that needs taken care of are most welcome additions to this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: