You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's a field in the package.json file that allows you to specify the project's license. There are tools that take advantage of this. For example, I use a tool like license-checker to help check that I'm not using a package that has an incompatible license.
When I ran that tool on my codebase, it was able to determine the license for most packages, but not able to do so for this package. This project's license is the MIT license, but the package.json currently has: "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE": https://github.com/segmentio/isodate/blob/master/package.json#L18
Would you be open to putting "MIT" in the package.json's "license" field?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's a field in the package.json file that allows you to specify the project's license. There are tools that take advantage of this. For example, I use a tool like license-checker to help check that I'm not using a package that has an incompatible license.
When I ran that tool on my codebase, it was able to determine the license for most packages, but not able to do so for this package. This project's license is the MIT license, but the package.json currently has: "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE": https://github.com/segmentio/isodate/blob/master/package.json#L18
Would you be open to putting "MIT" in the package.json's "license" field?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: