"take" is not work as expected

[makarkotlov]

That

will show

instead of

[selfrefactor]

This is how Ramda behaves as you can see here:
https://ramdajs.com/repl/#?R.take%281%2C%20%5B%5B%201%2C%202%2C%203%20%5D%5D%29

[makarkotlov]

This is how Ramda behaves as you can see here:
https://ramdajs.com/repl/#?R.take%281%2C%20%5B%5B%201%2C%202%2C%203%20%5D%5D%29

Thank you, but do you think that this is the right behavior?

[selfrefactor]

The latest major bump of Rambda was exactly to close as possible the difference in methods - selfrefactor/rambda#276

All the failing Ramda tests are displayed in Ramda readme witch click upon this test Expand to see allRamdatests failing forRambda, if you want to know in detail the difference between the two libraries.

Moreover, all of those failing tests are kept in https://github.com/selfrefactor/rambda/tree/master/files/failing_ramda_tests folder.

If Ramda change its behavior, then I will follow suit, but for now this is how it is.

I try to enhance Ramda rather than change existing behavior - for example R.filter in Rambda supports objects, while Ramda work only with arrays. Or introducing more return types from R.type.

At some point, Idecide not to match Ramda functionality, but that is exception, rather than a rule. I will close the issue, but feel free to comment further.