You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently to trigger a major release it is required to add BREAKING CHANGE to the body while this is not a problem there are moments where we could be adding more than a change. So i think it would be nice to accept this plural "BREAKING CHANGES", this would also prevent minor releases when we include the "s" at the by accident. I experienced this a lot, maybe because english is not my first language and i forgot to write the keyword as singular.
New feature description
This requires the commit analyzer to check wheter or not there is "BREAKING CHANGE" | "BREAKING CHANGES" present in the commit body
New feature implementation
I haven't check the code but it looks like an "or" could do the trick.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
New feature motivation
Currently to trigger a major release it is required to add BREAKING CHANGE to the body while this is not a problem there are moments where we could be adding more than a change. So i think it would be nice to accept this plural "BREAKING CHANGES", this would also prevent minor releases when we include the "s" at the by accident. I experienced this a lot, maybe because english is not my first language and i forgot to write the keyword as singular.
New feature description
This requires the commit analyzer to check wheter or not there is "BREAKING CHANGE" | "BREAKING CHANGES" present in the commit body
New feature implementation
I haven't check the code but it looks like an "or" could do the trick.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: