Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(AWS RabbitMQ): Support filterPatterns #11659

Merged

Conversation

shreyance-jain
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses: #11635

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 86.04% // Head: 86.56% // Increases project coverage by +0.51% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (357906d) compared to base (1b55710).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11659      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.04%   86.56%   +0.51%     
==========================================
  Files         314      313       -1     
  Lines       13175    13100      -75     
==========================================
+ Hits        11337    11340       +3     
+ Misses       1838     1760      -78     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/plugins/aws/package/compile/events/rabbitmq.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/cli/run-serverless-tencent.js
bin/serverless.js 48.00% <0.00%> (+0.94%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@medikoo medikoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @shreyance-jain !

@medikoo medikoo merged commit e769570 into serverless:main Jan 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants