You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hi, this is a great work.
As you metioned in the paper, you did experiments on Occ-Linemod, using the pvnet results as the initial pose. Can you please share the pvnet initial result? Any format is okay, Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry to bother you again.
But I am a little confused by the initial poses. It is very different from the ground truth. For example, for ape in frame 1, the provided initial pose is [-1.1688580e-01, 1.1876651e+00, 1.7402347e+00, 1.7772609e-02, 7.4241700e-04, 1.1550709e-02], but the ground truth is {"cam_R_m2c": [0.79796083, 0.6023787, -0.02630684, 0.38035542, -0.53676251, -0.7533023, -0.46784284, 0.59102839, -0.65733923], "cam_t_m2c": [183.63633301, -131.49685045, 1147.30061109], "obj_id": 1}.
I know the first three number is the rotation angles, but I can't see the relationship between the last three number and the cam_t_m2c.
Could you please explain a little bit for me? Thanks!
Hi, this is a great work.
As you metioned in the paper, you did experiments on Occ-Linemod, using the pvnet results as the initial pose. Can you please share the pvnet initial result? Any format is okay, Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: