Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

用不了咯 #521

Closed
9crk opened this issue Oct 7, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

用不了咯 #521

9crk opened this issue Oct 7, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@9crk
Copy link

9crk commented Oct 7, 2017

用不了咯。。。

@timothyqiu
Copy link
Contributor

Please refer to the Issue Template and provide at least the ss-local.log.

@9crk
Copy link
Author

9crk commented Oct 8, 2017

说的不是这个软件用不了了。。是shadowsocks官网。。提供的服务器 不行了

@timothyqiu
Copy link
Contributor

This project is just a macOS SS client. It has nothing to do with any SS service provider.

If it's a server failure, you should contact the service provider instead.

@skksdd
Copy link

skksdd commented Oct 8, 2017

去问你的服务商, shadowsocks没有所谓官网
这边是shadowsocksX-NG讨论的地方.不出售任何所谓“服务”
如果你分不清楚,请先做一些功课.

@9crk
Copy link
Author

9crk commented Oct 9, 2017

@skksdd shadowsocks.com 不是官网?跟维护者没有半毛钱关系?

@timothyqiu
Copy link
Contributor

No, it has nothing to do with the Shadowsocks project although it has the word shadowsocks in the fancy ".com" domain name.

The official site of the Shadowsocks project is shadowsocks.org (Corresponding repo of the site is https://github.com/shadowsocks/shadowsocks-org).

@skksdd
Copy link

skksdd commented Oct 9, 2017

@timothyqiu

Thx for your great contribution to ShadowsocksX-NG.

Recently, massive Chinese shadowsocks service providers were in a bad situation where their IP or ports are banned by Chinese ISPs.

As a result, lots of their customers began to spam their complaints here and there.

Sorry for all the inconvenience you're going through.

You have a good day:)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants