Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
561 lines (557 loc) · 11.8 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

561 lines (557 loc) · 11.8 KB

Heuristic for Graph Coloring

Shalin Shah

Implementation of the DSatur[1] heuristics for graph coloring in Java. The heuristic follows the following steps:

  1. Compute a clique (maximum is good)
  2. Color the clique
  3. Sort the rest of the vertices in non-increasing order of the degree of saturation
  4. Color the vertices in the order given by 3. Also, when a vertex is colored, change the degree of saturation of the neighboring vertices so that the order of coloring changes
  5. Improve the coloring using Iterated Greedy techniques [2]
  6. Improve the coloring using min-conflicts local search
  7. Report the coloring

Instances are available here and here.

[1] "New methods to color the vertices of a graph", Brelaz D., CACM 22(4) pp 251--256.
[2] "Iterated Greedy graph coloring and the difficulty landscape", Culberson J. (See here).

Cited By:

  • Mirarab, Siavash, et al. "Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree." Science 346.6215 (2014): 1250463. (PDF)
  • https://github.com/smirarab/binning
  • Ahmad Muklason, "Hyper-heuristics and Fairness in Examination Timetabling Problems"

The algorithm was run on a few benchmark instances and the results are shown in the following table.

Instance Vertices Optimum Found - Best Found - Worst
frb30-15-1 450 30 30 30
frb30-15-2 450 30 30 30
frb30-15-3 450 30 30 30
frb30-15-4 450 30 30 30
frb30-15-5 450 30 30 30
frb50-23-1 1150 50 50 50
frb50-23-2 1150 50 50 50
frb50-23-3 1150 50 50 50
frb50-23-4 1150 50 50 50
frb50-23-5 1150 50 50 50
frb53-24-1 1272 53 53 53
frb53-24-2 1272 53 53 53
frb53-24-3 1272 53 53 53
frb53-24-4 1272 53 53 53
frb53-24-5 1272 53 53 53
frb56-25-1 1400 56 56 56
frb56-25-2 1400 56 56 56
frb56-25-3 1400 56 56 56
frb56-25-4 1400 56 56 56
frb56-25-5 1400 56 56 56
frb59-26-1 1534 59 59 59
frb59-26-2 1534 59 59 59
frb59-26-3 1534 59 59 59
frb59-26-4 1534 59 59 59
frb59-26-5 1534 59 59 59

The algorithm was run on a few more benchmark instances and the results are shown in the following table.

Instance Vertices Optimum Found - Best Found - Worst
fpsol2.i.1 496 65 65 65
fpsol2.i.2 451 30 30 30
fpsol2.i.3 425 30 30 30
inithx.i.1 864 54 54 54
inithx.i.2 645 31 31 31
inithx.i.3 621 31 31 31
*latin_square_10 900 - 124 125
le450_15b 450 15 18 18
le450_15c 450 15 25 25
le450_5a 450 5 6 6
le450_5b 450 5 7 7
le450_5c 450 5 7 7
le450_5d 450 5 7 8
mulsol.i.1 197 49 49 49
mulsol.i.2 188 31 31 31
mulsol.i.3 184 31 31 31
mulsol.i.4 185 31 31 31
mulsol.i.5 186 31 31 31
school1 385 - 15 15
school1_nsh 352 - 15 15
zeroin.i.1 211 49 49 49
zeroin.i.2 211 30 30 30
zeroin.i.3 206 30 30 30
anna 138 11 11 11
david 87 11 11 11
homer 561 13 13 13
huck 74 11 11 11
jean 80 10 10 10
games120 120 9 9 9
miles1000 128 42 42 42
miles1500 128 73 73 73
miles250 128 8 8 8
miles500 128 20 20 20
miles750 128 31 31 31
queen11_11 121 11 14 14
queen13_13 169 13 16 16
queen5_5 25 5 5 5
queen6_6 36 7 7 7
queen7_7 49 7 7 7
queen8_12 96 12 13 13
queen8_8 64 9 10 10
queen9_9 81 10 11 11
myciel3 11 4 4 4
myciel4 23 5 5 5
myciel5 47 6 6 6
myciel6 95 7 7 7
myciel7 191 8 8 8
* The algorithm was terminated before local search