You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In table 4, it seems the high-quality phrases provides a large effect on the performance.
And when you compare it with the fuzzy CRF, it seems the Fuzzy CRF outperform the tie-break mechanism, if you do not involve the high-quality phrases.
Could you elaborate more on that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nooralahzadeh
changed the title
Different in the performance without high-quality phrases?
Difference in the performance of autoNER when the high-quality phrases are not involved?
Feb 17, 2019
Fuzzy-CRF Model always use high-quality phrases. The "unknown" type brought by high-quality phrases is the reason that we want to use the Fuzzy-CRF layer.
In table 4, it seems the high-quality phrases provides a large effect on the performance.
And when you compare it with the fuzzy CRF, it seems the Fuzzy CRF outperform the tie-break mechanism, if you do not involve the high-quality phrases.
Could you elaborate more on that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: