Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Difference in the performance of autoNER when the high-quality phrases are not involved? #21

Closed
nooralahzadeh opened this issue Feb 16, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@nooralahzadeh
Copy link

nooralahzadeh commented Feb 16, 2019

In table 4, it seems the high-quality phrases provides a large effect on the performance.
And when you compare it with the fuzzy CRF, it seems the Fuzzy CRF outperform the tie-break mechanism, if you do not involve the high-quality phrases.
Could you elaborate more on that?

@nooralahzadeh nooralahzadeh changed the title Different in the performance without high-quality phrases? Difference in the performance of autoNER when the high-quality phrases are not involved? Feb 17, 2019
@shangjingbo1226
Copy link
Owner

Fuzzy-CRF Model always use high-quality phrases. The "unknown" type brought by high-quality phrases is the reason that we want to use the Fuzzy-CRF layer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants