Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please bump the version of the csv dependency #69

Closed
paride opened this issue Jul 17, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

Please bump the version of the csv dependency #69

paride opened this issue Jul 17, 2018 · 9 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@paride
Copy link

paride commented Jul 17, 2018

csv 1.0.0 is out, but hyperfile still depends in the beta version. Pease bump the dependency. This will help downstream (Debian) packaging.

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented Jul 17, 2018

I'm curious: Packaging for a particular distribution?

We do provide Debian packages on the Releases page.

That being said, I'm okay with bumping the dependency version for csv.

@sharkdp sharkdp added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Jul 17, 2018
@paride
Copy link
Author

paride commented Jul 17, 2018

Packaging for Debian :)
I mean: maintaining a package in the official Debian repository.

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented Jul 17, 2018

Wow, this is great to hear! Is there a ticket/thread for this somewhere? I'd love to follow the progress on that.

I totally forgot that we were on a beta version of the csv crate and definitely to upgrade to 1.0.0 as soon as it was released.

Closed via 94621ad.

@paride
Copy link
Author

paride commented Jul 18, 2018

Not really a thread, most of the Rust packaging work is being done here:

https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf

but before a package can be uploaded all its dependencies need to be already in Debian, so there is a lot to do!

I also plan to package fd and sad, but unfortunately I'll have to rename them, as other packages already install /usr/bin/fd and /usr/bin/sad (and the relative manpages).

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented Jul 18, 2018

Thank you very much!

I just released v1.2.0 with the fix.

I also plan to package fd and sad, but unfortunately I'll have to rename them, as other packages already install /usr/bin/fd and /usr/bin/sad (and the relative manpages).

It would be really great to see fd in Debian! Instead of renaming the executables, does Debian provide a way to mark two packages as conflicting? Or does Debian follow other policies in this respect?

What is sad?

@FranklinYu
Copy link

FranklinYu commented Sep 24, 2020

@paride Hi, is Hyperfine currently packaged in Debian official repository? I don’t see Debian on Repology of this package. I did find fd-find though.

Note: I found this issue right before I filed bug 970843.

@paride
Copy link
Author

paride commented Sep 24, 2020

Hi,

hyperfine is not packaged in Debian yet. There was a packaging attempt but from this file:

https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/blob/master/src/hyperfine/debian/BLOCK

looks like it's blocked by missing dependencies.

@FranklinYu
Copy link

FranklinYu commented Oct 31, 2020

You should have used a permanent link, because now the file is gone in master branch. 😄

https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/blob/601671abe39610405e0c394d2f8e51c5325a27a8/src/hyperfine/debian/RFS

Also my bug was closed as duplicate of bug 908776.

Anyway, thank you for the effort. Will be tracking those files and bugs.

@FranklinYu
Copy link

See latest update in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-hyperfine. TL;DR not yet in stable, won’t be in Bullseye (Debian 11).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants