Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

My article about your package #10

Closed
tirthajyoti opened this issue Dec 1, 2019 · 14 comments
Closed

My article about your package #10

tirthajyoti opened this issue Dec 1, 2019 · 14 comments
Labels

Comments

@tirthajyoti
Copy link

Hi,

I found your package quite useful and pretty neat. I may contribute to it later with ideas and suggestions for enhancement.

For now, I have written an article about it and it has gained traction pretty fast.

Check out the article here.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

shaypal5 commented Dec 1, 2019

@tirthajyoti, this is awesome! Actually a friend shared it with me yesterday, and I just finished going through it. Great stuff, man. I'm so happy you found this little thing useful. Contributions are more than welcomed. :)

Like I mentioned in my comment to the article, I'd love it if you be willing to link to the project repository itself a few times over the course of the article, so more people get here, perhaps star the repo and see the documentation. I think this can help it spread, which my drive contributions and make it even better! :)

Cheers,
Shay

@tirthajyoti
Copy link
Author

I linked this Repo on all the places the word pdpipe is mentioned in the article.

Please feel free to give a link to my article in your Readme or anywhere you like.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

shaypal5 commented Dec 2, 2019

Thanks! Will do!

@shaypal5 shaypal5 closed this as completed Dec 2, 2019
@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

shaypal5 commented Dec 2, 2019

Can I get a friends link, so I'm sure anyone who wants to rely on this as a tutorial can indeed read your article?

@shaypal5 shaypal5 reopened this Dec 2, 2019
@tirthajyoti
Copy link
Author

Instead of Medium article, I can create a Markdown and either host it on my Github.io or in the project itself. Give me a few days for that.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

shaypal5 commented Dec 3, 2019

Sounds good! :)
Thank you.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

shaypal5 commented Dec 7, 2019

Hey @tirthajyoti

I've added the RowDrop stage to pdpipe in the latest release, v0.0.33, which can solve one of the more complex operations in your blog post in a single pipeline stage. Instead of three stages, you can remove all rows for which the price is smaller or equal to 250000 by using the following stage:
pdp.RowDrop({'Price': lambda x: x <= 250000})

If you don't mind, I'd love for you to update the blog post, so the cleaner solution is presented.

Thanks!
Shay

@tirthajyoti
Copy link
Author

OK, @shaypal5 I will test it in my Notebook and add as an update to my article.
I have been out this whole week on business travel, so will get to it next week.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

shaypal5 commented Dec 8, 2019

Cool! Waiting for an update...

@tirthajyoti
Copy link
Author

Hey @shaypal5 , I updated the article on Medium and also created the Free Markdown version so that users can refer there. It is hosted on my Github.io page and here is the link.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, man! :)

Can I bother you again? I've created a simple homepage for the package:
https://pdpipe.github.io/pdpipe/

Would you mind updating the links in the article to point to the homepage instead of the repository? I think it's way more friendly to newcomers.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

Also, the hyperlink on my name doesn't work, and I'd love it to point to my personal website anyway, is possible. Thanks!

(My personal address: http://www.shaypalachy.com/)

image

@tirthajyoti
Copy link
Author

Updated these links now.

@shaypal5
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants