New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
is the config file you provide the optimal parameter?? #10
Comments
Hey, thanks for pointing this out. Let me check and get back to you! |
Thanks for your timely reply. I am looking forward to your check result and it will help a lot to me, another question. What dose the dummy relation mean in your code. I am confused about the code where the 'dummy, dummy_scores' appeared ,i.e what the code(agent.py) below used to do??
Thanks very much for helping me!!! |
Hey, |
Thanks a lot for your reply,I have reproduced the result for FB15k-237 with your help ! Thanks again for your timely reply and kindly help, great job! |
Thanks! :) |
Hi @Lee-zix, is there anything fixes to reproduce the results? |
Is this problem solved? |
Thanks for reading my question!
is the config file you provide the optimal parameter?? I run a experiment on the dataset FB15K-237 with the default config file your provide . the results seems a lot different from the result in your paper?This is my result:
INFO:root:Hits@1: 0.1069
04/29/2018 12:23:52 AM: [ Hits@1: 0.1069 ]
INFO:root:Hits@3: 0.1904
04/29/2018 12:23:52 AM: [ Hits@3: 0.1904 ]
INFO:root:Hits@5: 0.2314
04/29/2018 12:23:52 AM: [ Hits@5: 0.2314 ]
INFO:root:Hits@10: 0.2864
04/29/2018 12:23:52 AM: [ Hits@10: 0.2864 ]
INFO:root:Hits@20: 0.3413
04/29/2018 12:23:52 AM: [ Hits@20: 0.3413 ]
INFO:root:auc: 0.1655
04/29/2018 12:23:52 AM: [ auc: 0.1655 ]
Could you help me to reproduce the result of your paper??
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: