You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Although I think we can leave as is for version 2.0, we should consider if it is better to be extend the simplification and to enable implicit ANDs between shape expressions in general.
However, I am not sure if allowing it would increase readability, so I open this issue to open a discussion about it for future versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, ShExC allows to simplify shape expressions when the first one is a node constraint omitting the keyword AND.
So the following two shapes are equivalent:
However, if the left part of the AND is another shape, then it is not possible to omit the AND:
Although I think we can leave as is for version 2.0, we should consider if it is better to be extend the simplification and to enable implicit ANDs between shape expressions in general.
However, I am not sure if allowing it would increase readability, so I open this issue to open a discussion about it for future versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: