removed misleading information about function declarations #113
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removed misleading comment information in the following examples:
In those examples the comments state that one of the benefits of those patterns is that they allow recursive functions. While that is true it is not a benefit of those examples over the others since all of the examples currently presented allow recursion.
The way the information is presented it implies that the pattern:
does not allow recursive functions and that is not the case (this jsfiddle example might clarify that: http://jsfiddle.net/k6SSL/1/).
Furthermore one of the comments stated that one of the benefits of naming getDataF was that you can "Recurse by calling the name + 'F'". This suggests that we could not use recursion by calling getData() instead of getDataF() and we can (jsfiddle example: http://jsfiddle.net/4Pd9j/2/).