Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

sqlalchemy classical mapping #161

Closed
gbrennon opened this issue May 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

sqlalchemy classical mapping #161

gbrennon opened this issue May 29, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@gbrennon
Copy link

gbrennon commented May 29, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Hey folks,

I'm using sqlalchemy's datamapper approach through what they call the classical mapping

is it possible to implement this pattern using this package?
@gbrennon gbrennon changed the title Is it possible to use django-sorcery along with sqlalchemy's classical mapping? sqlalchemy classical mapping May 29, 2021
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 25, 2022
@shosca shosca converted this issue into discussion #172 Mar 25, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@gbrennon