Support for Inline Fragments

[artonge]

Hi,

Any plan to support Inline Fragments ?

Example :

query HeroForEpisode($ep: Episode!) {
  hero(episode: $ep) {
    name
    ... on Droid {  # <-- Inline Fragments
      primaryFunction
    }
  }
}

Do you think it would be feasible ?

Edit: manage to do without it. But it would be a nice feature :)

[dmitshur]

Yes, inline fragments are already supported. I still need to work on adding a section to README that explains how to do them. Let's use this issue to track that.

In the meantime, see issue shurcooL/githubv4#10 which was about union + inline fragment support. It was resolved in shurcooL/githubv4#15.

Edit: manage to do without it. But it would be a nice feature :)

Can you show you did it it? Then I can suggest a better way, if there is one.

[artonge]

Can you show you did it it? Then I can suggest a better way, if there is one.

I just found a way that don't need inline fragment in the API I use.

[dmitshur]

I see. Here's how you can do the above GraphQL query using graphql syntax:

query HeroForEpisode($ep: Episode!) {
  hero(episode: $ep) {
    name
    ... on Droid {  # Inline Fragment.
      primaryFunction
    }
  }
}

var query struct {
	Hero struct {
		Name  graphql.String
		Droid struct {
			PrimaryFunction graphql.String
		} `graphql:"... on Droid"` // Inline Fragment.
	} `graphql:"hero(episode: $ep)"`
}

[dmitshur]

@artonge, have you had a chance to try the above? Any issues?

[artonge]

Hi,
Sorry I was in holidays.
No I didn't tried it as I found an other way to do what I wanted.

[dmitshur]

The support for inline fragments is documented in README now:

https://github.com/shurcooL/graphql#inline-fragments

/cc @artonge FYI.