Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Kernel] use sundials integrators (CVODE and ARKode) as OSI for EventDriven Strategy instead of odepack #23

Closed
xhub opened this issue Mar 12, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

[Kernel] use sundials integrators (CVODE and ARKode) as OSI for EventDriven Strategy instead of odepack #23

xhub opened this issue Mar 12, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
@xhub @vacary
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
4.3

Comments

@xhub
Copy link
Member

xhub commented Mar 12, 2016

  • sundials (CVODE) is a good event-driven integrator.
  • it is packaged in Debian & Fedora
  • would allow us to have an event-driven integrator even if WITH_FORTRAN=NO
@xhub xhub mentioned this issue Mar 13, 2016
Closed
@xhub xhub self-assigned this Dec 20, 2016
@vacary vacary mentioned this issue Dec 30, 2016
Closed
@vacary vacary self-assigned this Dec 30, 2016
@vacary vacary changed the title [Kernel] add CVODE as a EventDriven OSI [Kernel] use sundials integrators (CVODE) as OSI for EventDriven Strategy Dec 30, 2016
@vacary vacary changed the title [Kernel] use sundials integrators (CVODE) as OSI for EventDriven Strategy [Kernel] use sundials integrators (CVODE) as OSI for EventDriven Strategy instead of odepack Dec 30, 2016
@vacary vacary changed the title [Kernel] use sundials integrators (CVODE) as OSI for EventDriven Strategy instead of odepack [Kernel] use sundials integrators (CVODE and ARKode) as OSI for EventDriven Strategy instead of odepack Dec 30, 2016
@vacary
Copy link
Member

vacary commented Dec 30, 2016

Furthermore, it uses MPI and it has been designed for HPC.

I will to start the project into a branch

@xhub
Copy link
Member Author

xhub commented Jun 8, 2017

Postpone to 4.2?

@vacary
Copy link
Member

vacary commented Jun 9, 2017

I agree. I ll put it into the milestone 4.2

@vacary vacary added this to the 4.2 milestone Jun 9, 2017
@bremond bremond modified the milestones: 4.2, 4.3 Jan 30, 2018
@vacary
Copy link
Member

vacary commented Mar 31, 2020

Transferred in Wiki

https://github.com/siconos/siconos/wiki/Wish-list-and-enhancement

@vacary vacary closed this as completed Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@xhub xhub

@vacary vacary

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@xhub @vacary @bremond