You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are linking our builds.date.iso to builds.latest.iso on testbuilds, also the md5 and sha256 files which is wrong, the md5/sha256 file is generated against builds.date.iso and then only linked to the new file, that doesn't work and is totally wrong!
We must generate a new builds.latest.iso.md5/sha256 file and copy this too testbuilds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In my opinion the checksums in the md5/sha256 files are correct. The given filename contains the build date instead of 'latest' and at the same time the relase number is missing. If the iso file is renamed, the checksum test is successful.
For example:
$ mv siduction-Masters_of_War-xfce-amd64-latest.iso siduction-22.1.2-Masters_of_War-xfce-amd64-202305281611.iso
$ sha256sum -c siduction-Masters_of_War-xfce-amd64-latest.iso.sha256
siduction-22.1.2-Masters_of_War-xfce-amd64-202305281611.iso: OK
At the same time please eliminate the md5 files. They have been considered insecure for a long time.
We are linking our builds.date.iso to builds.latest.iso on testbuilds, also the md5 and sha256 files which is wrong, the md5/sha256 file is generated against builds.date.iso and then only linked to the new file, that doesn't work and is totally wrong!
We must generate a new builds.latest.iso.md5/sha256 file and copy this too testbuilds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: