Colexification, Phonology and Norms/Ratings

wikipron

non-empty languages: 164, dedup+entry>10: 105

intersection of colex and prons.

data/preprocessed/colex_pron_langs.csv

with (lat, long) geo information
- data/preprocessed/colex_pron_geo.csv
dedupped:
- data/preprocessed/colex_pron_geo_dedup.csv
- data/preprocessed/langs_nr.json

phonemes vs. concretness

IPA

start with plosive/fricative (binary)

kiki bouba effect concretness

NEXT STEPS:

COMPARE ALSO WITH Gast paper, phylogenetic relations (DataStageV)
compare different set of lexicons with different previous work
make some nice visualizations of colexifications.

colexifications

entries: 945382
lexicalizations 129677, colexification 510198
ignoring the lexical form per (colex, lang): 859296
6713 pair of languages.

phonemes

concepts intotal: 22348, having more than 1 language: 20176
data/phon/lang2lang_phon.csv

Analysis

Colex and Concreteness

clear support for hypothesis : the conepts closer in concreteness are more probable to colexify
- analyze it monolingually and crosslingually
- linear regression, coefficients.
related work about conceptual background for colexification

geo/colex/phonology

clear support for phonology/geo
- farther the languages' distances are, further the phonetic similarity
colex doesn't have this clear-cut support

languages

top-family, isocode, etc. https://glottolog.org/resourcemap.json?rsc=language