Discrepancies between specs and sample rules

[SherifEldeeb]

Schema in the specs defines "reference" and "falsepositives" to be str; yet sometimes they're str, sometimes they are list in the sample rules.

If I may suggest going with "list" and update the rules accordingly, changing single strs to a list with one item for the sake of consistency (I'd gladly update all the rules and submit a PR), or if it will be decided that they could be either a str or list, then update the specs.

[thomaspatzke]

Thanks for pointing this out! This should be a list of strings, as alternatives are not allowed in the Schema definition. Already fixed that in the specification. PR with the fixed rules would be nice!

[SherifEldeeb]

Thanks for updating "falsepositives" in the schema, but I believe "reference" is still defined as str ... I know it's too late to call it "references", but I guess it should be a list as well nevertheless.

re:PR: will do when I have time (hopefully < a week)

[thomaspatzke]

Yes - just renamed it to references and made a list from it.

Ok, that's fine, looking forward to your PR :)

[SherifEldeeb]

should be addressed by #64