Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dense/Compact View #2155

Closed
virtuallynathan opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 8 comments
Closed

Dense/Compact View #2155

virtuallynathan opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@virtuallynathan
Copy link

Feature

Currently the app is not very dense/compact, messages take up a lot of space. Please consider a dense/compact view option to collapse messages closer together.

@gasi-signal
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your feature request @virtuallynathan. For the short-term, have you considered using the View > Zoom Out feature to show more content (albeit smaller) at once?

@GitGerby
Copy link

GitGerby commented Jan 3, 2021

I'd also be interested in removing the 'avatars' / photos on the contacts as well as removing the most recent line of conversation from the contacts list. I'm more interested in density than I am previews.

@JitinDhillon
Copy link

Not sure if this is a bug, or just not implemented, but messages are not compacted like the mobile apps. For example on Android consecutive messages look like this:

Where as on the desktop version they look like this:
Signal_FvBI9vk06a

It makes it harder to easily scan and read through messages when there is so much unnecessary information on the screen.

@benaiahhenry
Copy link

A compact/dense view would be great!

@EvanHahn-Signal
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for commenting here. This is something we're thinking about and working with our Design team on—know that we hear you!

@w3sip
Copy link

w3sip commented Jan 14, 2021

One more vote for compact view, for contact list more so than messages.
Also, it seems the app (on MacOSX at least) can't be resized below a certain minimal size -- I believe the current constraints are too restrictive.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 24, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Sep 24, 2021
@GitGerby
Copy link

This is still an ongoing request; though it's not received prioritization as yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants