Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complete exception safety and noexcept hygiene #34

Open
simonask opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Complete exception safety and noexcept hygiene #34

simonask opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers version-2.1 Features that are destined for version 2.1

Comments

@simonask
Copy link
Owner

Currently, many functions are marked noexcept, despite potentially calling user-provided functions that may throw. The right thing to do is to add noexcept(noexcept(...)) syntax in those places.

The drawback is that it uglifies the code pretty significantly.

There are also probably places where unconditional noexcept can be safely added.

@simonask simonask added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers version-2.1 Features that are destined for version 2.1 labels Nov 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers version-2.1 Features that are destined for version 2.1
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant