-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do we need CO simulations? #23
Comments
sure can do that . |
@giuspugl would you have any update on this? |
Sara Simon @smsimon has alerted me to existence of updated bandpass models here: https://github.com/smsimon/bandpasses/ . She tells me these will be incorporated in to sotodlib, but one could fetch them from there and use them right away. |
Yes, it's private. I'll ask Sara to make a team or add us to an existing team that gives us access. |
@zonca it is here now: https://github.com/simonsobs/instrument_model. We decided to make a general place where instrument modeling things can go and people/sotodlib can access them. |
@giuspugl would you like to check which CO lines impact which channel using those bandpasses? |
@smsimon for CO studies shall I consider the Bandpassess without any beam effect (i.e. files with just On-chip bandpass filters + Gain effects? |
Yes, working on that. |
CO lines with realistic bandpassesState of the art bandpasses to date can be found in the instrument model repo, as pointed out by @smsimon. LATI considered bandpasses from the files MF_wOMT_wLPF_v1_LAT_beam.txt and UHF_wOMT_LAT_beam.txt SATI considered bandpasses from the files MF_wOMT_wLPF_v1_SAT_beam.txt and UHF_wOMT_SAT_beam.txt Summary
|
in the plan for #39 |
The CO component is available in
so_pysm_models
, see the documentation, it has been implemented by @giuspugl.We need to check more realistic bandpasses and see if we really need to add CO to our simulations. @giuspugl would you volunteer to do this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: