Request: JooQ

[SimoneGiusso]

Brand Name

JooQ

Website

https://www.jooq.org

Popularity Metric

It's Popular

Official Resources for Icon and Color

None

Additional Comments

No response

[PeterShaggyNoble]

Thanks for the request, @SimoneGiusso

Note, though, that the statement "It's popular" is not a metric of popularity. Please update your request to include one of the metrics mentioned in our issue template.

[SimoneGiusso]

Thanks for the request, @SimoneGiusso

Note, though, that the statement "It's popular" is not a metric of popularity. Please update your request to include one of the metrics mentioned in our issue template.

I know. On the other hand Similarweb rank is requesting access to my google account and some other personal data I'm not willing to expose. I'll will evaluate with pleasure any other alternatives metrics

[PeterShaggyNoble]

You do not need to create an account to use Similarweb; just search for the domain you want to see data on.

[adamrusted]

I'm seeing that SimilarWeb are hard pushing their account system. You can (at least for now) bypass it using the below format:
https://similarweb.com/website/google.com/#overview
Replacing Google.com with the domain you're wanting to compare.

[adamrusted]

Similarweb Rank: 687,150

On this metric alone, it would be out of scope for this project. Do you have another metric we could use?

[SimoneGiusso]

On this metric alone, it would be out of scope for this project.

Why? Is it too popular? 😅

btw reactor-core has 4.7K GitHub stars.

[adamrusted]

Quite the opposite.
We require a brand to have a SimilarWeb rank of 500,000 or lower in order to add them - unless another of our accepted metrics is met.

[SimoneGiusso]

Ah more the metrics is high less is popular, OK.

If you sum all the stars of the GitHub subprojects it goes above 5000 Github stars without any problems. Can be this considered enough?

[PeterShaggyNoble]

Unfortunately, we don't accept the sum of the stars on all repos, @SimoneGiusso, for the primary reason that there's a high probability that the same people are starring multiple repos, and also as the primary repo should be popular enough to stand on its own by that metric.

Is there anything in #9979 that might help give an indication of Jooq's popularity?

[SimoneGiusso]

Unfortunately, we don't accept the sum of the stars on all repos, @SimoneGiusso, for the primary reason that there's a high probability that the same people are starring multiple repos, and also as the primary repo should be popular enough to stand on its own by that metric.

Is there anything in #9979 that might help give an indication of Jooq's popularity?

The brand is in existence for at least one year.

First release 10 August 2010

Its website has a Similarweb global rank of 500k or higher

690,474

The website's Similarweb rank in any one country is either:

No data

The website's Similarweb rank in any one category is either:
In the top 100, or,
10k or higher, with a global rank of 1m or higher,

13,095

Its packages meet one of the following minimum requirements:

The package is not distribute this package manager. Why do include a metric the raking in maven? In this case it is in position 1187 but only 5th in the sub category

The brand's popularity can be illustrated by other publicly available & verifiable statistic (e.g., downloads, usage)
Stats should preferably also include data on one of our existing brands so we can make a direct comparison

Ok, this is linked to what I was saying above.

Cucumber is not far from Jooq:

• 1066 Global ranking
• 49 in sub category

Gatling instead:

• 8179 Global ranking, however it's only
• 2 in sub category

The brand's popularity can be illustrated through a Google Trends comparison

Jooq
Cucumber
Gatling

Where applicable, the primary repository for the brand's GitHub project meets the following requirements:
A minimum of 5k GitHub stars will be required for consideration, and,
An additional 1k will be required for each year the project is in existence beyond its initial year, providing,
The repository is still active, and,
its star history is on a consistenly upward trajectory.

It has 5.7k stars. Repository is super active and the stars trend is Cleary upward.

[adamrusted]

Now the new metrics have been finalised:

SimilarWeb Rank:
Global: 562,381
Country (USA): 381,800
Category (in USA): 6,393

Download Stats:
As @SimoneGiusso mentioned, it's available on Maven Repository, showing 1,180th on the entire site, or 5th in Object/Relational Mapping.
As far as 'Usages' go - its' most recent release only has 21 uses, so if we're to use that as our stat, not many usages there.

Trends:

[PeterShaggyNoble]

I'm not sure what numbers we should be expecting on Maven but that no version is breaking triple figures for usage is pretty damning to me.

It does compare favourably to Gatling, but Gatling is now outside our scope and should be reviewed further for potential removal.

Much as I want to, I just don't see anything in all the data presented here that would justify us adding it at this time. It's Similarweb global ranking is on a strong upward trend and, even though it's currently sitting just below our threshold of 550k that would warrant further monitoring, maybe we give it a chance and hold of until SW's next data update?

[adamrusted]

As per @PeterShaggyNoble's comments - I'm going to close this one as out of scope Issues or pull requests that are beyond the scope of the project . Feel free to re-open it if it does come into scope, @SimoneGiusso.