You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it is a little shorter and fits in better with the other repo names. This repo is essentially a monorepo of go code that can be used to build both edge and cloud IoT apps, so it seems go is a fitting name for the repo.
Let me know any thoughts, or if this will greatly inconvenience anyone? Now is better than 2 years from now to make this change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've decided to leave as is. The repo includes both frontend and backend code (go/elm), so its not really pure go, and who knows -- we may end up with a different language for the backend some day, so I think simpleiot is the most flexible and descriptive, even though the go imports look a little ugly. But, with goimports integration in editors, most developers don't manually type out import paths anymore.
On gophers slack, I was advised by one person not to use a vanity import url, like many go projects do:
renaming will give us a go import path of:
github.com/simpleiot/go
instead of:
github.com/simpleiot/simpleiot
it is a little shorter and fits in better with the other repo names. This repo is essentially a monorepo of go code that can be used to build both edge and cloud IoT apps, so it seems go is a fitting name for the repo.
Let me know any thoughts, or if this will greatly inconvenience anyone? Now is better than 2 years from now to make this change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: