Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

k7z includes non-Free rar code? #5

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 11, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

k7z includes non-Free rar code? #5

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 11, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Does this application use the same 7z.dll as 7zip, thus including the non-Free 
rar code?

Thanks,

Sam.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by tuke...@googlemail.com on 6 Sep 2010 at 12:16

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Licensing information is available via the above 'Wiki' tab.  Let me know if 
you think anything is incorrect or missing.

Original comment by Xavio...@gmail.com on 7 Sep 2010 at 2:24

  • Added labels: Component-Docs, OpSys-Windows, Priority-Medium, Type-Other

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I'm a bit confused because that page indicates that the whole of k7z is GPLv3 
but as I understand it, it uses 7z.dll which includes non gpl code. So k7z 
cannot be gplv3 if it includes 7z.dll, as this is non-Free.

Sorry to be a pain but I'm clarifying in reference to a software compilation 
that needs to be 100% Free Software.

Thanks,

Sam. 

Original comment by tuke...@googlemail.com on 13 Sep 2010 at 12:48

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Do you think this problem would go away if I somehow prevent #7Z from calling 
any of the RAR-related functions?

I noticed that 7-Zip uses the LGPL for most of its source code.  Do you think 
that I should just switch #7Z to that license?

In any event, if it's going to be too much of a hassle, just exclude #7Z from 
the software compilation that you're referring to.

Original comment by Xavio...@gmail.com on 17 Sep 2010 at 12:20

  • Changed state: Accepted

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I communicated with the Free Software Foundation about this matter months ago 
via email.  Their feedback prompted me to switch the licensing for some of my 
applications to LGPL v3.

Original comment by Xavio...@gmail.com on 21 Apr 2011 at 12:04

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant