New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cryptos must be empty when DTLS is active 63.0.3239.108 #437
Comments
I tried using the following flag rtpengine offer UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF ICE=force SDES-no rtcp-mux-offer but rtpengine returns to opensips with this ERROR:rtpengine:parse_flags: error processing flag `SDES-no': unknown flag Is this flag unsupported by opensips? |
I have no idea. Never even looked at the opensips module. In the kamailio counterpart, any unrecognized option is passed to rtpengine verbatim as a flag. I suggest you take it up with the opensips guys. |
@soulofmischief87, Did you solve this with OpenSIPS? |
May I know, how did you resolve this issue @soulofmischief87 |
Yes, I resolved this by using opensips 2.3 which allows for passing flags opensips did not support prior. http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.f.rtpengine_offer As stated in the documentation "When passing an option that OpenSIPS is not aware of, it will be blindly sent to the rtpengine daemon to be processed."[2] you can set the following SDES-no when creating the offer towards a WSS peer. |
Thanks for the response @soulofmischief87. I'll update my opensips to 2.3 and post the outcome soon. |
It is resolved after upgrading to opensips 2.3 and set SDES-no when creating the offer. |
Hello,
I am seeing issues with the latest version of chrome 63.0.3239.108 when sending an offer generated with the following flags:UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF ICE=force rtcp-mux-offer. I am using the latest pull of rtpengine. I tried removing SDES with SDES-off but had no luck. Does anyone have any idea why this is happening now?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: