Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

命名、别名、备注和书签合并到属性设置中 #1275

Closed
lss6378 opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

命名、别名、备注和书签合并到属性设置中 #1275

lss6378 opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
@88250 @Vanessa219
Labels
Enhancement
Milestone
1.2.0-beta6

Comments

@lss6378
Copy link

lss6378 commented Jan 25, 2021

你在什么场景下需要该功能？ In what scenarios do you need this function?

  • 块命名/块别名/块备注, 现在是三个入口，对于内容块来说，我认为三者都是块的属性。
  • 既然是属性，入口做成一个，可以同时查看/编辑，提高交互体验，也便于理解
    图片

描述最优的解决方案 Describe the optimal solution

入口合并成一个：
图片
编辑以卡片/块的方式展现，可以同时编辑/查看“块命名/块别名/块备注”：
图片

其他信息 Other information

思源版本: 0.6.7
操作系统：win10
@88250 88250 changed the title 命名别名备注合并为块备注 命名别名备注操作入口合并为属性 Jan 26, 2021
@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Apr 30, 2021

感谢老铁的提议，暂时不考虑了。

@88250 88250 closed this as completed Apr 30, 2021
@88250 88250 self-assigned this Jun 7, 2021
@88250 88250 added the Feature label Jun 7, 2021
@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Jun 7, 2021

v1.2.0 beta4 实现。

@88250 88250 reopened this Jun 7, 2021
@88250 88250 changed the title 命名别名备注操作入口合并为属性 Named alias remarks operation entry merged into attributes Jun 7, 2021
@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Jun 11, 2021

延迟一波…… 😓

@88250 88250 changed the title Named alias remarks operation entry merged into attributes 命名、别名、备注和书签合并到属性设置中 Jun 11, 2021
@88250 88250 added this to the 1.2.0-beta6 milestone Jun 11, 2021
@88250 88250 added Enhancement and removed Feature labels Jun 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@88250 88250

@Vanessa219 Vanessa219

Labels
Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.2.0-beta6
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@88250 @Vanessa219 @lss6378