You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to implement the active learning on Cityscapes with DRN model (https://github.com/fyu/drn). I followed the implementation details in your paper: drn_d_22 architecture, Adam optimizer, lr 5e-4, epoch 40, batch size 4, crop size 688. However, the performance already reaches 59.26 mIoU over 30% samples selected randomly, which is much higher than your reported performance in Fig. 8. Could you kindly tell me whether I made anything wrong? or can you share your command to train the drn network?
Thank you very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @PatMouLu, thank you for your interest in our work. We also implemented our semantic segmentation experiment based on https://github.com/fyu/drn. For 30% and 100% training data, we got 53.5% and 62% mIoU. VAAL [ICCV'19] reports a similar result for Cityscapes, where 30% data gets ~53.7% mIoU and 40% data gets 56% mIoU with basically identical experimental settings.
I am not quite sure what leads to the performance difference of our implementations. The code for semantic segmentation is not compatible with this repo, so it was not released.
Hello, thank you for this nice work.
I am trying to implement the active learning on Cityscapes with DRN model (https://github.com/fyu/drn). I followed the implementation details in your paper: drn_d_22 architecture, Adam optimizer, lr 5e-4, epoch 40, batch size 4, crop size 688. However, the performance already reaches 59.26 mIoU over 30% samples selected randomly, which is much higher than your reported performance in Fig. 8. Could you kindly tell me whether I made anything wrong? or can you share your command to train the drn network?
Thank you very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: