Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need for even deeper hierarchy level #309

Open
LasseMempel opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Need for even deeper hierarchy level #309

LasseMempel opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@LasseMempel
Copy link

The thesaurus I am working with has two deeper hierarchy levels than currently supported.
Any chance there is space for these? Or to avoid future issues of the same type a limitless (to a certain degree) nesting support?

@acka47
Copy link
Member

acka47 commented Jun 17, 2024

Thanks for the request, @LasseMempel. This is similar to #156 where we already added support for additional hierarchies.

@sroertgen
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @LasseMempel ,

limitless is difficult due to the fact that graphql does not support recursion. But two more levels should be no problem.

@acka47 so should we just add two more levels?

Maybe at some point in the future we can think about restructuring the graphql queries to allow limitless levels

@LasseMempel
Copy link
Author

Two more levels would be a nice start ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants