New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] wishlist of interval and probabilistic foreasters #1742
Comments
|
From my side:
|
and, of course, adding proper probability outputs in all the forecasters that already should return intervals, variances, etc. |
Started squared/absolute residual wrapper in #2698. |
@fkiraly, adding on to your suggestions: Adding parallelization to
Adaptive window length: The ability to adjust the rolling window length |
Good point! For tabular regressors, @Ram0nB has implemented a Perhaps that estimator might be a good starting point? One issue with the idea is, also, that there are no "pure quantile forecasters" in |
How would that work? Would it be any different from tuning via grid search etc? |
I was thinking the adaptive window length feature would monitor the behavior of the data. When the data exhibits significant variability, this would automatically adjust the size of the rolling window accordingly. Which would ensure that recent changes in the data are captured more accurately. But yes, you are correct this wouldn't actually be any different from tuning via grid search. |
This issue is to create a wishlist of interval forecasters and probabilistic forecasters.
Anyone can add wishes here, in the end we prettify and move to the forecasting wishlist.
Interval forecasters have
predict_quantile
orpredict_interval
.(or
predict_var
but that's more variance forecaster)Probabilistic forecasters will have
predict_proba
, i.e., predict full distributions.We should also include compositors, especially those converting point foreceasters into interval or probabilistic forecasters.
Inspiration can be the M5 competition, but we should also make sure we have "simple baselines" such as "constant variance = back-test aggregate variance" etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: