Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

where did the basic_registry::has function go? #690

Closed
DNKpp opened this issue Apr 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

where did the basic_registry::has function go? #690

DNKpp opened this issue Apr 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation docs related issues/requests

Comments

@DNKpp
Copy link
Contributor

DNKpp commented Apr 10, 2021

Hey, I recently started getting used to enTT and the wiki and doxygen refer to a basic_registry::has function but I'm not able to find it in 3.7 release or master branch. Did you remove it?
I've already found the try_get function, but then I have to apply a custom logic checking if all components are not nullptr.

Greetings

@Green-Sky
Copy link
Contributor

it has been renamed to all_of.
if the docs still say has, thats an error...

@DNKpp
Copy link
Contributor Author

DNKpp commented Apr 10, 2021

Thank you very much!
I'm currently searching for the location in the wiki where I've read about it, but haven't found it yet. Nevertheless, here is the doxygen link.
https://skypjack.github.io/entt/classentt_1_1basic__registry.html#a1795b1221d728f806319a685930f520d
The docs version says 3.6.0, so I think the updated version is missing here? https://github.com/skypjack/entt/deployments/activity_log?environment=github-pages

@skypjack
Copy link
Owner

Ah, I forgot to update it! Good point.

@skypjack skypjack self-assigned this Apr 10, 2021
@skypjack skypjack added the documentation docs related issues/requests label Apr 10, 2021
@skypjack
Copy link
Owner

Updated. Thanks. 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation docs related issues/requests
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants