Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is the traditional iterator version of "Drain" as implemented by a few other libraries something people actually want? #26

Closed
slightlyoutofphase opened this issue Dec 2, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Is the traditional iterator version of "Drain" as implemented by a few other libraries something people actually want? #26

slightlyoutofphase opened this issue Dec 2, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@slightlyoutofphase
Copy link
Owner

I'm not sure. I can implement it if so, though (with the method to create it called something like drain_iter I guess.)

Any opinions anyone has would be very much appreciated!
@slightlyoutofphase
Copy link
Owner Author

I just went ahead and did this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@slightlyoutofphase