Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial phase for LaserGaussian3D #696

Closed
III0K opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Initial phase for LaserGaussian3D #696

III0K opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
feature-request something that could be added to the code

Comments

@III0K
Copy link

III0K commented Feb 13, 2024

The problem and the context

I can't use two separate linearly polarized gaussian beams created via LaserGaussian3D block to form a circularly polarized one, because where is no option to put an extra phase delay of pi/2 in one linearly polarized beam. For this simple case it is not actually a problem at all, as there is an option "polarization=+1".
Nevertheless, the problem mentioned above emerges when one tries to form nearly circularly polarized pulse by combining two linearly polarized pulses propagating at small angle. This scheme may be of importance when dealing with high intensity sources of laser pulses (petawatt, femtosecond range), as there is no reliable way of transforming a linearly polarized light of high intensity into circularly polarized one. Moreover, presently there are multiple multi-petawatt-class laser facilities presently being built are designed on multiple beam architecture.

The solution

I would like to have an opportunity to chose arbitrary phase delay of pulses created via LaserGaussian3D block. This can be done by adding an exra keyword in corresponding block in the form "delay_phase = 0.0".

@III0K III0K added the feature-request something that could be added to the code label Feb 13, 2024
@mccoys
Copy link
Contributor

mccoys commented Feb 13, 2024

There is actually an argument to do that but it has not been documented. It is phase_zero.

You can use it for now, but I may change it soon to delay_phase for consistency

@mccoys
Copy link
Contributor

mccoys commented Mar 22, 2024

Done here: 8acdf36

@mccoys mccoys closed this as completed Mar 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request something that could be added to the code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants