Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sources: missing command instead of package #916

Merged

Conversation

sergiusens
Copy link
Collaborator

We are checking for missing commands and calling them packages. So
commands is what needs to be exposed. In addition to that, use shutil.which
instead of a straight out subprocess call.

LP: #1642799
Signed-off-by: Sergio Schvezov sergio.schvezov@ubuntu.com

We are checking for missing commands and calling them packages. So
commands is what needs to be exposed. In addition to that, use `shutil.which`
instead of a straight out `subprocess` call.

LP: #1642799
Signed-off-by: Sergio Schvezov <sergio.schvezov@ubuntu.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@come-maiz come-maiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lg

@sergiusens sergiusens merged commit 3d6050a into canonical:master Nov 18, 2016
@sergiusens sergiusens deleted the bugfix/1642799/commands-not-packages branch November 18, 2016 11:30
kalikiana pushed a commit to kalikiana/snapcraft that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
We are checking for missing commands and calling them packages. So
commands is what needs to be exposed. In addition to that, use `shutil.which`
instead of a straight out `subprocess` call.

LP: #1642799
Signed-off-by: Sergio Schvezov <sergio.schvezov@ubuntu.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants