meta:Feature

[KonradHoeffner]

There are 307 instances of meta:Feature but this class is not in our diagram, where is it coming from?

The meta:typicalFeature triples were already included in the initial GitHub commit from 2016-08-09, https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IMISE/snik-ontology/a0aef41ed23292c7b25313badf8b5e5b29cb92b7/bb.rdf.

The instances aren't well described however:

SELECT DISTINCT(?p)
{
 ?x a meta:Feature.
 ?x ?p ?o.
}

p
--
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label

SELECT DISTINCT(?p) ?type
{
 ?x a meta:Feature.
 ?o ?p ?x.
 ?o a ?type.
}

p | type
-- | --
http://open.vocab.org/terms/defines | http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#annotatedTarget | http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Axiom
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/typicalFeature | http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class

[KonradHoeffner]

SELECT COUNT DISTINCT ?c ?f
{
 ?c meta:typicalFeature ?f
}

Result: 174

meta:typicalFeature is not defined at all. Investigate its usage.

SELECT DISTINCT ?c ?f
{
 ?c meta:typicalFeature ?f
}

c	f
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/PatientAdministrationSystem	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureAdministrateTheMasterPatientIndex
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/PatientAdministrationSystem	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureAdmitPatientsToTheWard
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/DataWarehouseSystem	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureAnalyzeData
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/PictureArchivingAndCommunicationSystem	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureArchivePictures
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/EnterpriseResourcePlanningSystem	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureAssignDoctorsToPatientsOrRooms
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/NursingManagementAndDocumentationSystem	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureAssignDoctorsToPatientsOrRooms
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/LaboratoryInformationSystem	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureAssignOrderAndBloodSamplesToDevices
...	....

SELECT DISTINCT ?s ?sup COUNT(?c) as ?COUNT
FROM <http://www.snik.eu/ontology>
{
  ?c meta:typicalFeature ?f.
  ?c meta:subTopClass ?s.
  ?c rdfs:subClassOf ?sup.
}

s	sup	COUNT
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ComputerBasedApplicationComponent	148
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/IntegrationTechnology	2
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/ComputerBasedApplicationComponent	22
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/Middleware	2

SELECT DISTINCT ?s ?sup COUNT(DISTINCT(?c)) as ?COUNT
FROM <http://www.snik.eu/ontology>
{
  ?c meta:typicalFeature ?f.
  ?c meta:subTopClass ?s.
  ?c rdfs:subClassOf ?sup.
}

s	sup	COUNT
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/IntegrationTechnology	1
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/Middleware	1
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/ComputerBasedApplicationComponent	1
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/meta/EntityType	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/ComputerBasedApplicationComponent	13

So we can nearly define the domain as meta:ComputerBasedApplicationComponent, however there are a few exceptions:

class	feature	superclass
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/IntegrationPlatform	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureServiceCombination	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/IntegrationTechnology
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/IntegrationPlatform	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureServiceOrchestration	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/IntegrationTechnology
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/CommunicationServer	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureMessageQueuing	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/Middleware
http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/CommunicationServer	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/FeatureMulticasting	http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb/Middleware

Middleware is a subclass of IntegrationTechnology. Both of them don't have a superclass of ComputerBasedApplicationComponent. We could change property of those 4 triples to isAssociatedWith.

[KonradHoeffner]

• Define in meta:

:Feature a owl:Class ;
    rdfs:label "feature"@en .

:feature a owl:ObjectProperty ;
    rdfs:domain :ComputerBasedApplicationComponent ;
    rdfs:label "feature"@en ;
    rdfs:range :Feature .

Added in commit 65e13e1.

[KonradHoeffner]

• Fix bb:IntegrationTechnology and bb:Middleware as features.

The easiest way is to make bb:IntegrationTechnology a ComputerBasedApplicationComponent.

@FranziskaJahn: Is it correct to make that change?

SPARQL
WITH <http://www.snik.eu/ontology/bb>
DELETE DATA {bb:IntegrationTechnology rdfs:subClassOf bb:InformationManagementEntityType.}
INSERT DATA {bb:IntegrationTechnology rdfs:subClassOf meta:ComputerBasedApplicationComponent.}

[KonradHoeffner]

@FranziskaJahn : Bitte Grafik vom Metamodell um "Feature" erweitern.

[KonradHoeffner]

@BirgitSNIK: Kannst du mir bitte mir die Quelldatei schicken, dann kümmere ich mich selbst darum. Welches Programm braucht man dafür?