关于renew的判断问题

[kina12333]

输入：
6
A-0009 2
A-0002 1
C-0002 1
A-0001 1
B-0010 2
A-0004 2
[2024-02-07] OPEN
[2024-02-07] 69095618 borrowed B-0010
[2024-02-07] 26321538 queried A-0001
[2024-02-07] 26321538 ordered B-0010
[2024-02-07] 69095618 borrowed C-0002
[2024-02-07] 69095618 queried credit score
[2024-02-07] 69095618 ordered A-0002
[2024-02-07] 26321538 borrowed C-0002
[2024-02-07] CLOSE
[2024-03-08] OPEN
[2024-03-08] 69095618 renewed B-0010
输出：
0
[2024-02-07] [accept] 69095618 borrowed B-0010
[2024-02-07] A-0001 1
[2024-02-07] [accept] 26321538 ordered B-0010
[2024-02-07] [accept] 69095618 borrowed C-0002
[2024-02-07] 69095618 10
[2024-02-07] [reject] 69095618 ordered A-0002
[2024-02-07] [reject] 26321538 borrowed C-0002
0
1
[2024-03-08] move B-0010 from bs to ao for 26321538
[2024-03-08] [accept] 69095618 renewed B-0010

如上案例，判断错误的原因是应为reject
但我认为此处的renew应当是合理的

[solor-wind]

同学你好，这条数据中B-0010共2本，在续借时，一本被69095618借走，一本被26321538预约且仍有效，满足课程组的“续借时，若存在任意一位用户对该书正在生效的预约且该书无在架余本，则续借失败”要求