You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi,
in the experiment section, you mentioned that labeled and unlabeled data are randomly shuffled and selected. I wanted to know why it's necessary to have each mini-batch containing both labeled as well as unlabeled data?
What happens if one of mini-batch contains only unlabeled data (since the majority of data is unlabeled)? Can we handle that case? What would be the value of loss?
I'm new to semi-supervised.
thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In semi-supervised learning of classification, the minibatch size is very large (100-512). Therefore, labeled and unlabeled losses can be calculated simultaneously within one mini-batch. In the same way as above, we want labeled data and unlabeled data to be calculated simultaneously.
In the case of SSD, since the mini-batch size is large(32), we followed the same as the classification. In the case of R-FCN, however, since the mini-batch size is 4, we sampled labeled and unlabeled data as 1:3.
hi,
in the experiment section, you mentioned that labeled and unlabeled data are randomly shuffled and selected. I wanted to know why it's necessary to have each mini-batch containing both labeled as well as unlabeled data?
What happens if one of mini-batch contains only unlabeled data (since the majority of data is unlabeled)? Can we handle that case? What would be the value of loss?
I'm new to semi-supervised.
thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: