Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performing evaluation with DECA #5

Closed
danperazzo opened this issue Jul 7, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Performing evaluation with DECA #5

danperazzo opened this issue Jul 7, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@danperazzo
Copy link

Hello guys, thank you for releasing the code for your amazing research!
I have been trying to perform the allignment withe results obtained with the DECA technique.
However, I have stumbled into issues regarding the allignment with the ground-truth scans.

We were using the landmarks available with the face model, however, they seem not to be the landmarks that you used during the evaluation for DECA> How did you manage to make the quantitative evaluation with deca and which landmarks did you use? Do you have any file on the vertices?

@TimoBolkart
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, you are right, the now_evaluation only uses the subset of the overall landmarks (see here for details).
You can see the static landmarks for FLAME labeled here, so you just use the landmarks with indices [19, 22, 25, 28, 16, 31, 37] as input to the now_evaluation. Does that answer your question?

@danperazzo
Copy link
Author

Hello @TimoBolkart. Thank you! Another question, the now dataset only has scans with people in neutral expressions.
So, I supose that to perform the evaluation correctly I need to zero the expression and jaw pose coefficients in the FLAME model. Is that correct?

@TimoBolkart
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @danperazzo, yes, we only have scans in neural expression, and again yes, using zeros for expression and jaw pose coefficients for FLAME, to evaluate the identity dependent shape only, is the way to go.

@danperazzo
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants