Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should "oracle" be installed via rpm on RHEL? #136

Closed
StFS opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Should "oracle" be installed via rpm on RHEL? #136

StFS opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@StFS
Copy link

StFS commented Feb 12, 2014

This is more of a question than an issue.

I'm just wondering whether the oracle recipe should check for the existence of the java-1.7.0-oracle (available on RHEL from the rhel-extras repository) instead of downloading the binary and performing a "manual" install.

@jcarapet
Copy link

I was curious about a similar issue with this cookbook. I was hoping to install Java 1.7( jdk-7u51-linux-x64) via a local RPM in my binary repository instead of downloading it, but I have not been having a lot of luck from my efforts to configure the cookbook. Might be already solved with a different ticket but I haven't seen it yet.

@carmstrong
Copy link
Contributor

Have you tried using the oracle_rpm install_flavor and overriding node['java']['oracle_rpm']['type'] with the desired package name?

If that works well, we may need better logic for setting that attribute.

@erichelgeson
Copy link
Contributor

Did setting that node attribute work for you?

@jcarapet
Copy link

For me, setting the install type and version attributes was the trick to solving all the problems. I forgot how annoying this was when I was starting out with Chef.

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented May 3, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants