Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix UI inconsistencies #737

Open
ununhexium opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Fix UI inconsistencies #737

ununhexium opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@AbdullahMuk
Labels
clean-backlog requires backlog cleaning component/edc-ui affected software component kind/bug Something isn't working scope/mds related to MDS

Comments

@ununhexium
Copy link
Collaborator

ununhexium commented Apr 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description - What happened? *

The data transfer parametrization options are inconsistent with the backend's capabilities.

Expected Behavior *

HEAD is not a supported method param. Don't show it.

The UI doesn't indicate that the Content-Type is mandatory when sending a body.

This needs fixing on the frontend side and the backend side.

Observed Behavior *

Doesn't show impossible choices to the user.

Steps to Reproduce

No response

Context Information

No response

Relevant log output

No response

Screenshots

No response
@ununhexium ununhexium added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Apr 19, 2024
@AbdullahMuk AbdullahMuk added component/edc-ui affected software component scope/mds related to MDS labels Apr 20, 2024
@AbdullahMuk AbdullahMuk self-assigned this May 1, 2024
@AbdullahMuk AbdullahMuk added the clean-backlog requires backlog cleaning label May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AbdullahMuk AbdullahMuk

Labels
clean-backlog requires backlog cleaning component/edc-ui affected software component kind/bug Something isn't working scope/mds related to MDS
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ununhexium @AbdullahMuk