You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 30, 2024. It is now read-only.
instead of running a fancy dim reduction to empirically find the hypothesised Marxist types of jobs, we could also just assume which of the activities (e.g. "advertising, marketing, public relations") map onto which Marxist category, and just go with that (for trend or sectoral analyses).
This seems obviously defensible for some:
"Advertising, marketing, public relations"
(adv / F309)
Seems to be clearly in the production of exchange value quadrant, while
"Nursing, caring, healing"
(care/F316)
seems to be in the reproduction of use value quadrant, etc.
Once we've built the index, we might still try and check how well it fits with actual jobs, or how people work together.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
instead of running a fancy dim reduction to empirically find the hypothesised Marxist types of jobs, we could also just assume which of the activities (e.g. "advertising, marketing, public relations") map onto which Marxist category, and just go with that (for trend or sectoral analyses).
This seems obviously defensible for some:
Seems to be clearly in the production of exchange value quadrant, while
seems to be in the reproduction of use value quadrant, etc.
Once we've built the index, we might still try and check how well it fits with actual jobs, or how people work together.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: