You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently this project can't be called Open Source or free software since it doesn't have a license that meets any of the 2 criteria (or even at all).
Just in case, if you want a recommendation, I'd recommend AGPL-3.0-or-later for the server and GPL-3.0-or-later for the client. If you want extensions to be able to remain proprietary, then LGPL-3.0-or-later is fine for the client, too. These would ensure that the project remains free software.
By the way, all contributors would need to agree to licensing their existing contributions under whatever license you choose. (This step doesn't need to be done in the future thanks to GitHub's ToS.)
(IANAL, this is not legal advice.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently this project can't be called Open Source or free software since it doesn't have a license that meets any of the 2 criteria (or even at all).
Just in case, if you want a recommendation, I'd recommend
AGPL-3.0-or-later
for the server andGPL-3.0-or-later
for the client. If you want extensions to be able to remain proprietary, thenLGPL-3.0-or-later
is fine for the client, too. These would ensure that the project remains free software.By the way, all contributors would need to agree to licensing their existing contributions under whatever license you choose. (This step doesn't need to be done in the future thanks to GitHub's ToS.)
(IANAL, this is not legal advice.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: