Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libfuzzer travis setup via cargo fuzz #54

Closed
spacejam opened this issue Aug 9, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

libfuzzer travis setup via cargo fuzz #54

spacejam opened this issue Aug 9, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@spacejam
Copy link
Owner

spacejam commented Aug 9, 2017

No description provided.

@spacejam spacejam added this to the correctness milestone Aug 9, 2017
@spacejam spacejam added this to doing in v1 Aug 9, 2017
@spacejam spacejam self-assigned this Aug 9, 2017
@spacejam spacejam moved this from doing to thinking in v1 Aug 11, 2017
@spacejam spacejam removed their assignment Aug 11, 2017
@spacejam spacejam moved this from thinking to back-burner in v1 Aug 11, 2017
@spacejam spacejam added this to fuzzing in correctness roadmap Feb 16, 2018
@anxiousmodernman
Copy link
Contributor

Saw something that might be relevant on Reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/89y5eo/fuzzing_as_a_service_startup_looking_for_rust/?st=jfn060ji&sh=a3a747da

Is this the cargo fuzz you're talking about?

@spacejam
Copy link
Owner Author

spacejam commented May 4, 2018

@ehiggs
Copy link

ehiggs commented May 4, 2018

Fuzzing isn't really a closed process. It has an unbounded time as the fuzzer keeps feeding new inputs. e.g. from @anxiousmodernman's reddit post:

For Rust projects, we did test against the Rust library for Cap'n Proto messages where we found a fairly obscure bug after ~2 weeks of fuzzing.

So I guess the intention here is to timebox the fuzzer for each build and hopefully the aggregate over many builds might find something?

@spacejam
Copy link
Owner Author

fuzzing is implemented, but you're right about it being more of a thing you kick to a spare server to run more or less continuously

v1 automation moved this from back-burner to done Nov 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
v1
  
done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants